"Science" claim, that in 6 months the globe is traveling (490.000 mph X 24 hours X 30 days X 6 months =) 2.116.800.000 miles WITH A SUN - following the sun's orbit around a galaxy. AND while that happened, the globe traveled to the exact opposite side of the sun, and you're now watching the night sky in the exact opposite direction compared to 6 months earlier.
2.116.800.000 miles later and looking in the EXACT OPPOSITE DIRECTION, from the other side of the sun, would we then see any of the exact same combinations of stars, as we did 6 months earlier?
The logic answer is: NO!
The FACT IS, that we DO!
If we recognize just one (1) star contelleation after 6 months (and we do), then the whole heliocentric theory and everything, connected to it, is revealed, as being a deliberate lie!
The heliocentric globe theory is completely illogical and therefore totally rejected by all common sense!
"Science" claim, that we travel with a sun around a galaxy at 490.000 mph, while also orbiting a sun at 67.000 mph at the same time. But Polaris has ALWAYS been positioned above the North Pole and ALL the other stars has ALWAYS shown the EXACT same pattern during a year FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, as long as mankind have recorded their movements in the sky.
So how can we be moving as "science" claim and STILL see the exact same combinations of stars NOW as we did thousands of years ago - no matter the alleged position of a globe relative to everything else in a galaxy, which is ALSO CONSTANTLY changing their own individual positions relative to everything else in a galaxy? Does that really make sense to you?
And if you want to use the "same galactic highway" argument, then how can you see the exact same star contellations in front of you, as you did 6 months earlier behind you?
Imagine traveling with the sun and looking in the direction of the center of a galaxy - to the right relative to the direction the sun is traveling, and then imagine 6 months later looking in the exact opposite direction away from the center of a galaxy - to the left of the suns direction this time.
Shouldn't there be a very very big difference in the concentration of stars, when looking towards the center of a galaxy compared to, when looking away from this galaxy center? Remember: the alleged solar system is allegedly placed in the outer edge of a galaxy, and that's why it would make such a big difference!
We should see a sea of light, when looking towards the center of a galaxy, where we could hardly tell one star from another, because they would all seem as one big wall of light. But when looking away from this center of a galaxy, 6 months later, we should see VERY FEW STARS compared to 6 months earlier (a fairly empty night sky), and we should also see a very different set of star constellations now, that we're looking in the exact opposite direction!
The theoretical Flat Earth map and the UN logo.
If you think, I'm religious, you're wrong.
If you think, I'm an atheist, you're also wrong.
I seek the absolute truth - no more and no less!
"The one, who seeks the truth,
is also the one, who reveals it."
*Jesus said: ”Beware of false prophets,
which come to you in sheep's clothing...”